How can two seemingly unrelated species that live in isolation from each other evolve into identical forms?
About 60 million years ago, Australia became fully separated from the other continents by the movement of tectonic plates. As a result, life forms in Australia followed their own evolutionary patterns with little to no mixing with outside species for many millions of years. At the time of the separation, the same species lived in Australia as lived in other parts of the world, but over many generations, the separated populations evolved differently. They lived in different places, with different climates, different predators and a lot of other different circumstances.
As these species evolved in different directions, some interesting variations showed up between the isolated Australian species and the species that evolved in the rest of the world. Kangaroos, for example, look and function differently from just about anything you can find outside of Australia. But even more surprising to biologists is that some species that were so far apart on the evolutionary tree of life that they could be considered only distantly related seemed to look almost exactly the same.
For example, a primitive rodent lived both on and off Australia at the time of separation. In Australia, one branch of this rodent’s descendants evolved into tree-dwelling creatures with flaps of skin stretching between their front and hind legs, allowing them to glide between trees on air currents. They’re known as flying phalangers. In the rest of the world, the primitive rodent evolved into a totally separate group of tree-dwelling creatures with gliding flaps — the flying squirrels.
How could this happen? Was the potential to develop gliding flaps already present in that primitive rodent, making it inevitable that such an animal would eventually evolve? Or did the pressures of both environments cause natural selection to push the rodents into a gliding form? And what about species that were never related to begin with, yet still evolved into startlingly similar forms?
The Environment Shapes the Species
The situation described with flying squirrels is known as parallel evolution. It occurs when two related species split from each other, evolve in different places and circumstances, yet end up developing many of the same traits. When two different species share a lot of traits, it’s known as morphological similarity. When two completely unrelated species develop morphological similarity, it’s known as convergent evolution. It’s sometimes impossible to decide which type it is because we don’t have complete knowledge of the evolutionary record. We have no way of knowing how closely two species were related millions of years ago.
The simple reason for parallel evolution occuring is that similar environments and similar populationpressures do indeed lead different species to evolve similar traits. A successful trait in one place is going to be successful in another. But that doesn’t really tell the whole story. After all, there are millions of species on Earth, and a lot of them don’t look anything like each other. Why do only some species exhibit parallel or convergent evolution?
It has to do with the way natural selection works. A species can change from one generation to another because of mutations to its genetic code or recombination of genetic information by sexual reproduction. These genetic changes show up as new or altered traits. A mutation might cause a species of bear to have much lighter coloring on its fur, for example. Traits that give the organism a greater chance to survive long enough to reproduce are more likely to be passed on to future generations, while less successful traits won’t be passed on as frequently. Thus, over time, the average of the traits across a population of organisms shifts — the most beneficial traits show up with much greater frequency.
Eventually, these accumulated beneficial traits make an organism very well-suited to function within a certain environment. This is the species’ ecological niche. The animals have adapted to live successfully within that niche but would probably do poorly outside it. A polar bear’s niche is at the top of the food chain in the cold, snowy climate of the Arctic. A polar bear that tried to live as a grazer in the African savanna wouldn’t fare well.
Photograph images derived from this illustration. From left (*placental mammals*) to right (*marsupial mammals*)
- Flying squirrel; Flying Phalanger
- Groundhog; Wombat
- Anteater; Numbat
- Mole; Marsupial Mole
- Mouse; Mulgara
How can two seemingly unrelated species that live in isolation from each other evolve into identical forms?
About 60 million years ago, Australia became fully separated from the other continents by the movement of tectonic plates. As a result, life forms in Australia followed their own evolutionary patterns with little to no mixing with outside species for many millions of years. At the time of the separation, the same species lived in Australia as lived in other parts of the world, but over many generations, the separated populations evolved differently. They lived in different places, with different climates, different predators and a lot of other different circumstances.
As these species evolved in different directions, some interesting variations showed up between the isolated Australian species and the species that evolved in the rest of the world. Kangaroos, for example, look and function differently from just about anything you can find outside of Australia. But even more surprising to biologists is that some species that were so far apart on the evolutionary tree of life that they could be considered only distantly related seemed to look almost exactly the same.
For example, a primitive rodent lived both on and off Australia at the time of separation. In Australia, one branch of this rodent’s descendants evolved into tree-dwelling creatures with flaps of skin stretching between their front and hind legs, allowing them to glide between trees on air currents. They’re known as flying phalangers. In the rest of the world, the primitive rodent evolved into a totally separate group of tree-dwelling creatures with gliding flaps — the flying squirrels.
How could this happen? Was the potential to develop gliding flaps already present in that primitive rodent, making it inevitable that such an animal would eventually evolve? Or did the pressures of both environments cause natural selection to push the rodents into a gliding form? And what about species that were never related to begin with, yet still evolved into startlingly similar forms?
The Environment Shapes the Species
The situation described with flying squirrels is known as parallel evolution. It occurs when two related species split from each other, evolve in different places and circumstances, yet end up developing many of the same traits. When two different species share a lot of traits, it’s known as morphological similarity. When two completely unrelated species develop morphological similarity, it’s known as convergent evolution. It’s sometimes impossible to decide which type it is because we don’t have complete knowledge of the evolutionary record. We have no way of knowing how closely two species were related millions of years ago.
The simple reason for parallel evolution occuring is that similar environments and similar populationpressures do indeed lead different species to evolve similar traits. A successful trait in one place is going to be successful in another. But that doesn’t really tell the whole story. After all, there are millions of species on Earth, and a lot of them don’t look anything like each other. Why do only some species exhibit parallel or convergent evolution?
It has to do with the way natural selection works. A species can change from one generation to another because of mutations to its genetic code or recombination of genetic information by sexual reproduction. These genetic changes show up as new or altered traits. A mutation might cause a species of bear to have much lighter coloring on its fur, for example. Traits that give the organism a greater chance to survive long enough to reproduce are more likely to be passed on to future generations, while less successful traits won’t be passed on as frequently. Thus, over time, the average of the traits across a population of organisms shifts — the most beneficial traits show up with much greater frequency.
Eventually, these accumulated beneficial traits make an organism very well-suited to function within a certain environment. This is the species’ ecological niche. The animals have adapted to live successfully within that niche but would probably do poorly outside it. A polar bear’s niche is at the top of the food chain in the cold, snowy climate of the Arctic. A polar bear that tried to live as a grazer in the African savanna wouldn’t fare well.
Photograph images derived from this illustration. From left (*placental mammals*) to right (*marsupial mammals*)
- Flying squirrel; Flying Phalanger
- Groundhog; Wombat
- Anteater; Numbat
- Mole; Marsupial Mole
- Mouse; Mulgara
"I love individuals. Every person you look at, you can see the universe in their eyes if you’re really looking."
George Carlin (via moonpeeker)
"In shamanic cultures, synchronicities are recognized as signs that you are on the right path."
Daniel Pinchbeck (via energiesoftheuniverse)
"She would be half a planet away, floating in a turquoise sea, dancing by moonlight to flamenco guitar."
Janet Fitch, White Oleander (via norockwithoutplastic)
